|
查看: 1376|回复: 17
|
在其他論壇看到的。NFA的誤導。。純遂分享
[复制链接]
|
|
|
NFA is not a main key to value a broker...it is just for broker which registered in USA...like here we in Malaysia, we have SSM and SC..n at US they have NFA..
so it mean if broker is not regulated by NFA..it doesnt mean that they r not ok n not regulated..it depend on which country where they registered...n they r regulated by the organization in that country..
if really true NFA wont allowhedging...it will only effect those broker which regulated by themonly...n d amount is so little compare to broker which is regulated byother organization outside US.
NFA不是一个主要的关键去評价broker，这是只是代表公司是在美國注冊。就像马来西亚，我们有SSM和SCC .美國就是NFA。
所以这意味着如果broker没有规定byNFA ..不代表它沒有注冊。它取决于所在国注册资料...他们只受該國的某些管理机製成任..
如果真的NFA 不接受 hedging ...它只会影响那些NFA的broker 罷了。。
[ 本帖最后由 pete81 于 16-4-2009 07:37 AM 编辑 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 15-4-2009 03:08 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 15-4-2009 03:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
在其他論壇看到的。純遂分享
USA creating a scene where they are the only one who could be trusted..
non NFA equal to not regulated or Scam. Included those regulated in certain Europe or Mid-East countries. To non USA citizen, trade forex with non-US regulated doesn't mean being scammed.
"Trade only with NFA regulated" is certain party misleading traders over the world, so that funding will be flow in US. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 15-4-2009 03:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 15-4-2009 03:26 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 隐剑隼人 于 15-4-2009 03:16 PM 发表 
USA creating a scene where they are the only one who could be trusted..
non NFA equal to not regulated or Scam. Included those regulated in certain Europe or Mid-East countries. To non USA citizen, ...
原來有這種事。。。
還有有一位前輩跟我說，其實我們當下在網上看到的broker大多數都是market maker。
包括很多大家每天都用這的。。。他們隨時能夠操縱价格，只是看他們要不要做而已。。
然後ECN broker 就是direct deal with bank 的，所以是最安全的，但相對的minimum deposit 也很高 25,000usd 以上。。。ECN broker 就像玩股票那樣，是需要排隊的。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 15-4-2009 03:53 PM
|
显示全部楼层
多谢分享，学到吔了 
那么请问有那位大大知道到底那间broker公司才是对bank,但是又不会好像ecn broker那样要排队来entry的吗？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 15-4-2009 03:55 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 15-4-2009 05:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
路过， spread 可以起到 15 在EU也是 ...., 不过还是有人会要，hehe 没办法！！！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 15-4-2009 05:24 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 15-4-2009 05:34 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-4-2009 01:39 PM
|
显示全部楼层
不能两全其美的,
forex broker 给你的leverage. logically 想, 可能吗???
1 : 400 ， 你付一块钱买 400 usd, 还要trade 来做什么?? 拿出来用就好la ...
你付 1000 usd, 有 400,000 usd, 够你三年生活费... 做莫broker 将好人给你将多钱? 都是希望从你身上吸回所有的钱罢了...
你trade 400,000 usd, 还要real time, 那里有人将得空收几千万的 货币来等你trade??? 还要每个国家的货币.
这就是所谓的 '虚盘' , 要你拿几十千出来赚几块钱的就叫 '实盘'
但是如果你不靠 levrage, 怎样赚大钱??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-4-2009 10:34 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
找其它的broker, swiss based company八。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2009 12:43 AM
|
显示全部楼层
据我所知
只要是在美國有進行currencies,commodities,securities,stock,futures,options這些投資的broker必須register NFA,CTFC 才算legal
英國是 NSA(National Securities Association)
就好像馬來西亞有SC(Securities Commission)只要有進行commodities,securities,stock都必須register SC才可以操作
沒有register一律都是illegal operation
這是US的feedback
[ 本帖最后由 仙劍 于 28-4-2009 12:46 AM 编辑 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 28-4-2009 09:36 AM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 仙劍 于 28-4-2009 12:43 AM 发表
据我所知
只要是在美國有進行currencies,commodities,securities,stock,futures,options這些投資的broker必須register NFA,CTFC 才算legal
英國是 NSA(National Securities Association)
就好像馬來西亞有SC(Secu ...
馬來西亞SC是不會approve forex broker in malaysia 的 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2009 12:56 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 pete81 于 28-4-2009 09:36 AM 发表 
馬來西亞SC是不會approve forex broker in malaysia 的
他們怕錢會流出海外，所以不會有forex broker在這裡 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 28-4-2009 02:27 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2009 08:42 PM
|
显示全部楼层
哦？但是很多人都问，有regulate 吗?hehe,  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2009 10:48 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
变色卡
千斤顶
2548 
69
