|
|
实达水景名邸 (Setia Eco Cascadia)交流区
[复制链接]
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 11:38 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 11:41 AM
|
显示全部楼层
冷酷@铁面 发表于 1-3-2013 09:55 AM 
这Mahogany第二间就是我的了....
比其他起好那么快，交锁匙时外墙漆色肯定变旧...
蛮美的~.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 12:50 PM
|
显示全部楼层
kookk 发表于 1-3-2013 07:40 PM
从网上拿的资料。。
The difference between these 2 are..LAND AREA is the plot of land, part of whi ...
Different Developer use difference method to calculate build up area.
Eg - East Ledang, Leisure Farm etc do not include car porch & open balcony is sized half of the area.
(generally for Semi D onward type)
Whereas most other development include patio, balcony & car porch to the full size.
Very easy to identify :
Eg - SEC Mahogany (see attached Layout Plan) -
Build up for L1 + L2 w/o car porch (intermediate) = approx 865 + 940 = 1805sqft
Build up is way below 2100sq-ft (as indicated in their web) if exclude car porch !
Thise who have the actual dimension (from the SPA Doc) can upload to verify. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2-3-2013 01:10 PM
|
显示全部楼层
wwave 发表于 2-3-2013 12:50 PM
Different Developer use difference method to calculate build up area.
Eg - East Ledang, Leisure ...
难怪Built-up不小，可是感觉小很多。。。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 03:36 PM
|
显示全部楼层
VampireIIX 发表于 2-3-2013 11:38 AM
Agreed, 如果没错应该只有1米高，我想是"Eco Concept"的关系吧。
所以我们真的要很注重我们的1st ...
希望我们的保安是一流的。因为那会提高屋价。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 03:40 PM
|
显示全部楼层
VampireIIX 发表于 2-3-2013 11:38 AM
Agreed, 如果没错应该只有1米高，我想是"Eco Concept"的关系吧。
所以我们真的要很注重我们的1st ...
如果邻居有养狗就 了
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 04:03 PM
|
显示全部楼层
kookk 发表于 2-3-2013 01:10 PM
难怪Built-up不小，可是感觉小很多。。。
有谁可以confirm , SEC 的build up area 到 底有加车位吗?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 04:32 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Ampang 发表于 2-3-2013 03:40 PM
如果邻居有养狗就了
狗还好，猫就不知道了。猫会跳
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 04:35 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Ampang 发表于 2-3-2013 04:03 PM
有谁可以confirm , SEC 的build up area 到 底有加车位吗?
如果照之前的算法，Build Up Area是有加车位。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 05:19 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Interestingly, Setia Eco Village current terrace in their web page seem more believable - that car porch is not included in the build up area.
Wonder why the different standard of measurement
Btw, the 3-sty SEC build up area may also exclude the car porch; someone with the dimension can upload for confirmation ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2-3-2013 06:35 PM
|
显示全部楼层
wwave 发表于 2-3-2013 05:19 PM
Interestingly, Setia Eco Village current terrace in their web page seem more believable - that car p ...
照理说，只有有盖的可使用的空间才可以被计算在内。。。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 08:48 PM
|
显示全部楼层
kookk 发表于 2-3-2013 06:35 PM
照理说，只有有盖的可使用的空间才可以被计算在内。。。
Better to check with SEC to confirm how they come out this Buit up area. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 09:09 PM
|
显示全部楼层
wwave 发表于 2-3-2013 12:50 PM 
Different Developer use difference method to calculate build up area.
Eg - East Ledang, Leisure ...
There are property that built up area are formulated it total space of a house consumes that includes the carpet area and the area of te walls put together that is approx 10% more then the carpet area.
Base on your finding which is 1805sqft, let said we guess correctly by mutliply by 10% , it give approx 1985sqft.
There also possiblity it use the Super Built up area calculation that includes built up area , plus common usable spaces like stair cases, passsages or lifts. it is usually 25% more then built up area. In this scenario , 1805sqft x 25% , that would be 2256sqft.
Either way we're short of or addition of built up size using above formula. 本帖最后由 traxxas 于 2-3-2013 09:11 PM 编辑
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2-3-2013 09:57 PM
|
显示全部楼层
traxxas 发表于 2-3-2013 09:09 PM
There are property that built up area are formulated it total space of a house consumes that inc ...
楼梯等等都是有算的（正常）
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 10:04 PM
|
显示全部楼层
traxxas 发表于 2-3-2013 09:09 PM
There are property that built up area are formulated it total space of a house consumes that inc ...
Using different method to calculate build up by the same developer seem quite unusual.
It may seem like "cheating" for potential buyer when things like this are not make know / inform by the developer either by their Sales personnel or indicated in their Property catalog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 2-3-2013 11:17 PM
|
显示全部楼层
wwave 发表于 2-3-2013 10:04 PM
Using different method to calculate build up by the same developer seem quite unusual.
It may s ...
That's might be developer sales strategies..
However, on the SPA it is using the Land size i.e. 166sqm which also means 22x80ft. There isn't any written of built up area on SPA, anyone can clarify this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-3-2013 10:06 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-3-2013 10:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
我们的clubhouse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-3-2013 10:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-3-2013 10:17 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
1855 
70
