智力障碍男孩新国贩毒判死刑 Richard Branson 和 Stephen Fry 齐求情

26-4-2022 04:30 AM| 发布者: ericpanglokyang | 评论: 8

摘要: 在不久之前，拥有智力障碍的印裔男子Nagaenthran 因涉嫌在新加坡运毒，而被当地法庭判处死刑并且在来临的4月27日执行死刑。虽然商界、政治界甚至马来西亚政府都纷纷要求新加坡总统特赦Nagaenthran 死刑判决，但是都 ...

在不久之前，拥有智力障碍的印裔男子Nagaenthran 因涉嫌在新加坡运毒，而被当地法庭判处死刑并且在来临的4月27日执行死刑。虽然商界、政治界甚至马来西亚政府都纷纷要求新加坡总统特赦Nagaenthran 死刑判决，但是都是徒劳无功。

日前，维珍航空董事长Sir Richard Branson 和英国知名演员Stephen Fry 也利用自己的网上和商界上的影响力向新加坡政府求请。在两人通过Twitter 发布的1分钟20秒的影片中，两人数次要求新加坡总统哈丽玛和总理李显龙绕过Nagaenthran 一条性命。

图片来源：网络

Sir Richard Branson 在影片中也表示“捍卫残疾人士的权益，一直以来都是新加坡走在世界的最前端。但是，处死Nagaenthran 无疑是在捍卫残疾人士的权益上扔下来一枚震撼弹，顿时让新加坡在国际的美好声誉勾上了巨大风险，其中就包括了商业节。”

President Halimah Yacob: please spare the life of Nagaenthran Dharmalingam
@reprieve @stephenfry #SaveNagaenthran #Singapore pic.twitter.com/ElpMHzsECV
— Richard Branson (@richardbranson) April 22, 2022

">Loading Tweet...

Stephen Fry 也表示“Nagaenthran 患有智力障碍所以他根本不知道自己的所作所为是否真的犯法，现在判他死刑真的是公开谋杀一名残疾人士。”最后Stephen Fry 也补充“Nagaenthran 面对运毒的审判已经有10年的时间，加上长时间被囚禁已经严重加重他的精神问题，所以希望新加坡总统可以特赦他。”

追踪我们的官方社媒

生气

惊讶

难过

好笑

无聊

收藏分享邀请

上一篇：《巨雕》或是《小鸡鸡》，看男生手上这部位就知晓下一篇：日本警察开发「痴汉求助APP」，少女被骚扰使用后获救，犯人也被顺利逮捕

最新评论

引用 yow_meng5727 26-4-2022 07:43 AM: 吸白粉却会使人的智商，越来越低。。。

引用 eVilLance 26-4-2022 09:44 AM: 多年前有瞄过一眼这个案件。
那时新加坡特赦了一名马来西亚籍囚犯，
改为终身监禁加鞭刑。
媒体就报道了其他正在服刑的马来西亚籍死囚。

从2009年犯罪，到现在2022年了，声援？
我还是支持反对废除死刑。

引用 kcchiew 26-4-2022 05:35 PM: 从大马运毒进新加坡的，要不是教育程度低，就是智障。

看来，有人把新加坡司法当智障。

去查一下他当年给的供词，这些是智障会说的吗？相信他妈说的话，究竟是谁智障脑残？

“。。。[size=0.9]The [appellant] has, at various points in time from his arrest till now, furnished vastly distinct accounts of why he had committed the offence:
[size=0.9](a) When the [appellant] was first arrested, he admitted in his contemporaneous statement that he knew that the Bundle contained heroin which he was delivering for King. He also stated that he had to deliver the heroin as he owed King money and was promised another RM500 after delivery. There was no mention of any threat made by King towards the [appellant’s] girlfriend if he had refused to make the delivery (see [9] above).
[size=0.9](b) During trial, the [appellant] denied knowledge of the contents of the Bundle, insisting that he was told that it contained “company products”. The [appellant] then claimed that he had made the delivery under duress – King had assaulted him and threatened to kill his girlfriend unless he made the delivery (see [9] above). The [appellant] repeated this account to Dr Koh when he was examined in [sic] on 14 and 21 March 2013.
[size=0.9](c) When the [appellant] was examined by Dr Ung on 19 April and 19 July 2016, he claimed that he had lied to Dr Koh. He had agreed to deliver the heroin for King because he was desperate for money, having owed a loanshark money. He was also motivated to obey King by a mixture of loyalty, awe, fear and gratitude. While he claimed that King possessed a gun, he omitted any mention of any threat to his girlfriend.
[size=0.9](d) When the [appellant] was examined by Dr Yap in the period from November 2016 to January 2017, he claimed that he belonged to a gang and had volunteered to deliver the Bundle on behalf of a fellow gang member who was reluctant to do so. He explained that he did so out of his loyalty to the gang and his gratitude to his gang leader, who had provided him with emotional and financial support. He emphasised that he was not coerced into performing the delivery.。。。”

引用 kcchiew 26-4-2022 05:38 PM: 本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 26-4-2022 05:42 PM 编辑

大家可以去看看第37段开始，他当年的供词，还有医生的诊断：

https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2019_SGCA_37