|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:11 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 carlosmak
救命啊～～ 神仙啊～～
白千军 发表于 8-7-2010 04:06 PM 
道歉啊!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:12 PM
|
显示全部楼层
我认为,天生扁脚的. 脚板吃地心,只有三点一侧面, 一个脚下中位踩个垫步就能减低平衡,种种破法都有. 不过 ...
JMLOU 发表于 8-7-2010 04:10 PM
JMLOU，现在你欠我一个道歉，请你立刻在任何CARI版区尤其是武术论坛，咏春区发言前为你所作所为负责任向我道歉，请立即道歉. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
这个我是学YBH，你的偶像。
他之前不是到处去说我侮辱五祖拳，每个贴去讲。
噢，他做就可以，我做就是浪 ...
carlosmak 发表于 8-7-2010 04:04 PM
OPO 说不可以就不可以咯!!我又不是YBH 二,我是向他请教功夫,并且从中找我练拳过程忽视的基础功的问题. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:21 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 白千军 于 8-7-2010 04:26 PM 编辑
回复 37# JMLOU
靠！！别一直拿OPO出来当挡箭牌:@ OPO现在跟你很熟啊？！别以为一直把OPO搬出来，到时版主要执行职责的时候会对你的所作所为网开一面:@ 别那儿乱攀关系，说得莞尔堂皇、说得处处在为OPO省论坛资源:@ 讲不过人就一直搬OPO出来当靠山，到时OPO版主真的出现执行职责的时候，你真的以为OPO会站在你那边，顺便感谢你那么为他着想啊？！发梦吧你！！幼稚！！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:28 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 41# carlosmak
可怜哦～～ 表哭～表哭～ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:47 PM
|
显示全部楼层
我提的是中國拳術的特色与力学物理牛頓第三定律的因果.
其他的要怎想怎做人各有志.
delight2010 发表于 8-7-2010 03:23 PM 
我还真的没读好书，我只知道牛顿是被苹果打到头那个。（不知道之后他有没有将苹果踩烂）
对！人各有志。我也在强调只要站在小木块上就会很自然的马上明白重心所在。因为有时要初学者在平地上去感受他们的重心还真的不简单哪！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:52 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 JMLOU
回复 37# JMLOU
靠！！别一直拿OPO出来当挡箭牌:@ OPO现在跟你很熟啊？！别以为一直把OPO搬出来，到时版主要执行职责的时候会对你的所作所为网开一面:@ 别那儿乱攀关系，说得莞尔堂皇、说得处处在为OPO省论坛资源:@ 讲不过人就一直搬OPO出来当靠山，到时OPO版主真的出现执行职责的时候，你真的以为OPO会站在你那边，顺便感谢你那么为他着想啊？！发梦吧你！！幼稚！！ 
若说ＯＰＯ说我该道歉我就做，不过ＣＡＲＬＯＳ 又不是ＯＰＯ 又明在搞无意义纠缠吵架贴，谁幼稚？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:58 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 47# JMLOU
看不懂吗？ 再看清楚哦～
靠！！别一直拿OPO出来当挡箭牌:@ OPO现在跟你很熟啊？！别以为一直把OPO搬出来，到时版主要执行职责的时候会对你的所作所为网开一面:@ 别那儿乱攀关系，说得莞尔堂皇、说得处处在为OPO省论坛资源:@ 讲不过人就一直搬OPO出来当靠山，到时OPO版主真的出现执行职责的时候，你真的以为OPO会站在你那边，顺便感谢你那么为他着想啊？！发梦吧你！！幼稚！！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 04:59 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 浪子归
比较 update 的是：他人笑我太疯癫，我笑他人看不清。
歐賣葛 发表于 8-7-2010 04:01 PM
不是 秋香站在石榴旁，振兴站在华安前 吗？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 05:00 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 05:04 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 50# 白千军
是抄《秋香怒点唐伯虎》的搞笑剧情，不是我编的.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 07:20 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 51# 浪子归
浪兄才是update的年轻人。 8月8号我们再来吟诗作对。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 09:05 PM
|
显示全部楼层
我认为,天生扁脚的. 脚板吃地心,只有三点一侧面, 一个脚下中位踩个垫步就能减低平衡,种种破法都有. 不过 ...
JMLOU 发表于 8-7-2010 04:10 PM
to compensate for physical weakness is always a disadvantage. However we dont live in a perfect world...
to know not about instability of the dynamics is problematic at high speed operation or under heavy impact. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 10:25 PM
|
显示全部楼层
OPO 说不可以就不可以咯!!我又不是YBH 二,我是向他请教功夫,并且从中找我练拳过程忽视的基础功的问题.
JMLOU 发表于 8-7-2010 04:16 PM
YBH是你的偶像啊，你语气又学他，有盲目崇拜他，又和他那么亲密无间(练武)，连思想都和他一模一样，你真的很崇拜他噢。
现在是你自己犯错，证据已经大大个摆在前面，你证明不了自己清白还不认栽?
有人半夜冲红灯撞到人，受害者说你冲红灯不对，那个人就说"警察(OPO)没有说我错我就是没错，因为警察没抓到我冲红灯"
各位看官，冲红灯没错噢?
JMLOU，现在你欠我一个道歉，请你立刻在任何CARI版区尤其是武术论坛，咏春区发言前为你所作所为负责任向我道歉，请立即道歉. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 10:32 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 carlosmak 于 8-7-2010 10:33 PM 编辑
to compensate for physical weakness is always a disadvantage. However we dont live in a perfect ...
delight2010 发表于 8-7-2010 09:05 PM
to compensate for physical weakness is always a disadvantage. However we dont live in a perfect world...
与肢体的弱点对抗是一件处于下风的举动，但是我们不是活在一个完美的世界。
to know not about instability of the dynamics is problematic at high speed operation or under heavy impact.
要知道的不针对不稳定性的强烈高速举动或者是处于极大撞击力?
DELIGHT兄，你这是答非所问，不是回答问题啊?
讨论应该用大家都明白的语言，这里是华语论坛，怎么你回答用英语，而且不是回答重点，你到底是怎么啦? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 10:55 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 delight2010 于 8-7-2010 11:00 PM 编辑
to compensate for physical weakness is always a disadvantage. However we dont live in a perfect ...
carlosmak 发表于 8-7-2010 10:32 PM
Sorry, sometimes my chinese pen software doesnt work. So please help to translate for me if possible. Thanks!
to know not about instability of the dynamics is problematic at high speed operation or under heavy impact.
要知道的不针对不稳定性的强烈高速举动或者是处于极大撞击力?
Your translation is not what I mean.
What I say is one needs to know the nature of the instability of the dynamic in an un balance system. Otherwise, it is problematic which this unbalance system is operate under high speed operation and or under heavy impact from different direction. It is all about system mechanics and dynamics. Nothing personal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 10:57 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Sorry, sometimes my chinese pen software doesnt work.
delight2010 发表于 8-7-2010 10:55 PM
are you talking about chinese writting pad or pen or the software alone?
网上中文输入法
CARI有这个软件，看上面CROSS BAR有这个软件，你可以使用 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 11:02 PM
|
显示全部楼层
are you talking about chinese writting pad or pen or the software alone?
CARI有这个软件，看上 ...
carlosmak 发表于 8-7-2010 10:57 PM
Thanks! let me find out.
BTW. I am trying to bring up physical dynamic instead of getting into who do what, what kungfu do what. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 11:06 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Thanks! let me find out.
BTW. I am trying to bring up physical dynamic instead of gett ...
delight2010 发表于 8-7-2010 11:02 PM
I think you might need to begin to learn how to use the chinese writing sofeware instead of getting what kung fu do what?
Not what kung fu do what=grammatical mistake.
你还是用华语罢。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-7-2010 11:17 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 carlosmak 于 9-7-2010 01:02 PM 编辑
What I say is one needs to know the nature of the instability of the dynamic in an un balance system. Otherwise, it is problematic which this unbalance system is operate under high speed operation and or under heavy impact from different direction. It is all about system mechanics and dynamics. Nothing personal.
delight2010 发表于 8-7-2010 10:55 PM
what is your point?
anything to do with wing chun straight punch and art of attacking opponents' center line?
have you even been told that when answering question,it is answer THE question,not going into a bigger circuit or going to travel in the universe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
3205 
51
