|
|
楼主 |
发表于 11-6-2017 09:05 AM
|
显示全部楼层
回声报关于爱德华兹的消息：
Insiders believe the suggestion FSG will demand an explanation from Michael Edwards over Van Dijk is likely to be wide of the mark. [Echo]
1. "据知情人士透露，芬威要爱德华兹解释范迪克事件的报道是不准确的。"
Why? Because they were already fully aware and involved in what was unfolding. Edwards would be telling them what they already know. [Echo]
2. "为什么？因为芬威已经知道并调查了事情的始末，爱德华兹能告诉他们的,也只是他们已知的。"
If Van Dijk was failure then it was collective failure & everybody will need to assess how to get Liverpool back on the front foot. [Echo]
3. "如果范迪科是由个人错误引出的集体错误,那么每个人都必须弄清如何才能利物浦重回主动."(原话也可以翻为从回正轨,原意有主动出击的意思.)
It’s time to get some deals over the line, start providing the vital strengthening which could take the squad to an exciting place. [Echo]
4. “现在是完成某些引援的时候,要开始作出能令提高阵容层次的重大补强."
Time is of the essence & the time to assess Michael Edwards & his team will be when the window ends, not when it has not yet opened. [Echo]
5."时间迫切,审议爱德华兹团队的时间应该在夏窗结束之后,而不是开始之前."
很明白,芬威很冷静,知道现在处理爱德华兹会影响到这个关键夏窗的补强,所以会将事情延后到夏窗结束之后.但是如果回声报引用的内线消息是正确的(回声报能引用的内线....也就是人X日报的署文章了),芬威对事情有论断了,所以觉得连听爱德华兹的解释也不必要了.. |
|
发表于 10-6-2017 03:25 PM
.gif)
2289 
60
